<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: User Curated Fur Movie List</title>
	<atom:link href="http://furglamor.com/2010/03/07/user-curated-fur-movie-list/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://furglamor.com/2010/03/07/user-curated-fur-movie-list/</link>
	<description>The Beauty of Women in Furs on Film and Television</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 18:48:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: GlamorinFurs</title>
		<link>http://furglamor.com/2010/03/07/user-curated-fur-movie-list/#comment-167</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[GlamorinFurs]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 19:58:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.furglamor.com/?p=557#comment-167</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;d rate the &lt;em&gt;Charlie&#039;s Angels&lt;/em&gt; series as overall pretty &quot;average&quot; at best, at least in terms of episode saturation.  Not a lot of fur episodes, but when it happened, it was excellent.

That seems like the point you were making about more modern filmmaking, I think.

I agree the pace of films changed as they matured, making it hard to convincingly keep an actress in a huge fox for extended periods of time. The 70&#039;s and 80&#039;s helped make up for that a bit by at least regularly providing some spectacular, if brief, viewing.

That brings my mind back to 80&#039;s daytime soaps, which I certainly wasn&#039;t watching at the time, but reason they may be the best examples of retaining that more classic Hollywood pacing in combination with seas of fox fur.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d rate the <em>Charlie&#8217;s Angels</em> series as overall pretty &#8220;average&#8221; at best, at least in terms of episode saturation.  Not a lot of fur episodes, but when it happened, it was excellent.</p>
<p>That seems like the point you were making about more modern filmmaking, I think.</p>
<p>I agree the pace of films changed as they matured, making it hard to convincingly keep an actress in a huge fox for extended periods of time. The 70&#8242;s and 80&#8242;s helped make up for that a bit by at least regularly providing some spectacular, if brief, viewing.</p>
<p>That brings my mind back to 80&#8242;s daytime soaps, which I certainly wasn&#8217;t watching at the time, but reason they may be the best examples of retaining that more classic Hollywood pacing in combination with seas of fox fur.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the green fairy</title>
		<link>http://furglamor.com/2010/03/07/user-curated-fur-movie-list/#comment-166</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[the green fairy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 21:38:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.furglamor.com/?p=557#comment-166</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[PS Sorry, i did not mean the &lt;em&gt;Charlie&#039;s Angels&lt;/em&gt; film but an episode of the series that they dressed up in furs.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PS Sorry, i did not mean the <em>Charlie&#8217;s Angels</em> film but an episode of the series that they dressed up in furs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the green fairy</title>
		<link>http://furglamor.com/2010/03/07/user-curated-fur-movie-list/#comment-165</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[the green fairy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 21:37:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.furglamor.com/?p=557#comment-165</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am certainly biased towards the earlier decades because I like the whole essence of that era as well as the fashion, I find something so exciting about it; something that it is difficult to explain.

 The films are so good as they are an escape into a time that will never return, the ladies are not only so glamorous but the film totally relies on the story. I have just finished watching &lt;em&gt;Blonde Cheat&lt;/em&gt; with Joan Fontaine looking absolutely immaculate throughout, she did not swear, there was no sex and no violence.

 It was also a time when ladies wore fur as a normal part of their dress so it would be more in evidence.

I looked through SimonG&#039;s list and I commend his efforts; I have watched several of the films. The &lt;em&gt;Charlie&#039;s Angels&lt;/em&gt; film was particularly good but I find a lot of the post 60&#039;s films to be disappointing as there does not seem to be a proliferation of fur as it was going out of fashion and never returned to the heydays of the 30&#039;s. I was particularly disappointed by &lt;em&gt;Beverly Hills Madam&lt;/em&gt;, every one raved on about it but the time fur was on the screen was very short; that seems to be the case with a lot of post 60&#039;s films.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am certainly biased towards the earlier decades because I like the whole essence of that era as well as the fashion, I find something so exciting about it; something that it is difficult to explain.</p>
<p> The films are so good as they are an escape into a time that will never return, the ladies are not only so glamorous but the film totally relies on the story. I have just finished watching <em>Blonde Cheat</em> with Joan Fontaine looking absolutely immaculate throughout, she did not swear, there was no sex and no violence.</p>
<p> It was also a time when ladies wore fur as a normal part of their dress so it would be more in evidence.</p>
<p>I looked through SimonG&#8217;s list and I commend his efforts; I have watched several of the films. The <em>Charlie&#8217;s Angels</em> film was particularly good but I find a lot of the post 60&#8242;s films to be disappointing as there does not seem to be a proliferation of fur as it was going out of fashion and never returned to the heydays of the 30&#8242;s. I was particularly disappointed by <em>Beverly Hills Madam</em>, every one raved on about it but the time fur was on the screen was very short; that seems to be the case with a lot of post 60&#8242;s films.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

